My complaint about Mr. Sachi Desai

http://www.pakin.org/complaint?title=Mr.&firstname=Sachi&middlename=&lastname=Desai&suffix=&gender=m&shorttype=f&pgraphs=5

What happened to Mr. Sachi Desai's common sense? What in perdition does Sachi think he's doing? And is Sachi hoping that the readers of this letter won't see the weakness of his argument relative to mine? This letter is not the place to explore the answers to those questions. Its purpose is instead to make Sachi answer for his wrongdoings. I want to share this with you because I have absolutely no idea why Sachi makes such a big fuss over sesquipedalianism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Sachi's apostles don't really care that I'm not a feeble-minded person. I'd like nothing more than to extend my hand in friendship to Sachi's backers and convey my hope that in the days to come we can work together to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. Unfortunately, knowing them, they'd rather shred the basic compact between the people and their government because that's what Sachi wants. Sachi's trucklers always show a streak of cruelty that enables them to find pleasure in their destructiveness. Here, too, the exception proves the rule: We must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that Sachi will pander to noisome yahoos. And to overcome these fears, we must enable patriots to use their freedoms to save their freedoms.

If, today, the urge of Sachi's war-soul can prompt him to mold the mind of virtually every citizen -- young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated -- then imagine, if you can, how that same soul will express itself through the thousandfold-more-worthless Sachi of tomorrow. He discounts important principles of our culture as mere platitudes, which is another way of saying that he claims to be supportive of my plan to grant people the freedom to pursue any endeavor they deem fitting to their skills, talent, and interest. Don't trust him, though; he's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, he'll persecute the innocent and let the guilty go unpunished. Not only that, but I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Sachi still has the ability to infiltrate and then dominate and control the mass media. The really interesting thing about all this is not that he has become a patsy to his own malevolence. The interesting thing is that he recently stated that might makes right. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary, because he has never gotten ahead because of his hard work or innovative ideas. Rather, all of his successes are due to kickbacks, bribes, black market double-dealing, outright thuggery, and unsavory political intrigue. Although cocky maniacs are relatively small in number compared to the general population, they are increasing in size and fervor. Just to add a little more perspective, I know some delirious devotees of conspiracy theories who actually believe that Sachi's newsgroup postings are Holy Writ. Incredible? Those same people have told me that the most valuable skill one can have is to be able to lie convincingly. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that Sachi has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that Sachi insists that his analects epitomize wholesome family entertainment. In the long run, however, he's only fooling himself. Sachi would be better off if he just admitted to himself that he is currently limited to shrieking and spitting when he's confronted with inconvenient facts. Sooner than you think, however, Sachi is likely to switch to some sort of "perpetuate inaccurate and dangerous beliefs about male-female relationships" approach to draw our attention away from such facts. Sachi tries to make his imprecations more palatable by wrapping them in rhetoric about the need to protect the interests of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden. Hard to believe? Then consider the following statement from one of Sachi's biggety legatees: "Sachi has the trappings of deity." Pretty materialistic, huh? Well, Sachi does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that society is screaming for his expositions, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

When I hear Sachi say that he has the authority to issue licenses for practicing jujuism, I have to wonder about him. Is he thoroughly unsympathetic? Is he simply being sadistic? Or is he merely embracing a delusion in which he must believe in order to continue believing in himself? The answer is rather depressing but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that Sachi is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. As part of his efforts to gain a mainstream following, he publishes the Journal of Brain-damaged Frotteurism. Included alongside articles discussing history, culture, art, religion, and philosophy are endorsements of his plans to impose a particular curriculum, vision of history, and method of pedagogy on our school systems.

If Sachi is going to talk about higher standards, then he needs to live by those higher standards. He wants all of us to believe that he can scare us by using big words like "semiprofessionalized". That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. Almost everyone will agree that Sachi's vassals are the carrion birds of humanity, but I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Sachi's part to support international crime while purporting to oppose it by the next full moon. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that Sachi has been trying to convince us that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. This pathetic attempt to seek vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging his reports deserves no comment other than to say that when Sachi tells us that going through the motions of working is the same as working, he somehow fails to mention that many of us do not wish to live within his walls of philistinism. He fails to mention that the simple ability to establish a supportive -- rather than an intimidating -- atmosphere for offering public comment is a pons asinorum that Sachi may never cross. And he fails to mention that he accuses me of being anal-retentive whenever I state that his sycophants are capable of little else but hating and lying, even to each other. Alright, I'll admit that I have a sharp tongue and sometimes write with a bit of a poison pen but the fact remains that I correctly predicted that Sachi would acquire power and use it to indoctrinate dour ruffians. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively -- or so soon. Please don't ask me to ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold. I simply can't do that.

If Sachi succeeds in his attempt to make all of us pay for his boondoggles, it'll have to be over my dead body. This point is so important that it deserves a separate discussion, which I'll provide in a moment. But first, let me just say that Sachi's litanies are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I strike at the heart of Sachi's efforts to create a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Sachi has for his satraps, his invariant response is to contaminate or cut off our cities' water supply. You might say, "He is a big fan of vigilante justice." Fine, I agree. But if he thinks that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is, then he's sadly mistaken. Thought should precede any attempt at intellectual writing. That's all I have to say. Thank you for reading this letter.